Error 17883 The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung:add information

After installing the 8.00.0818 patch i receive this error messages in the log
trying to schedule the backups at night, it occurs after approx three minutes
1. Error 17883 The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung
2.Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 2,bp 0xe501c0, page
1:15), stat 0xb, object ID 2:1:2, EC 0x36F094E8 : 0, waittime 300. Not
continuing to wait.
3.Waiting for type 0x2, current count 0x2a, current owning EC 0x3CD3D570.
any suggestions
Best wishes
Hi
There was an issue with 818 see
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;[LN];Q826161 try patch to
819 or 878 http://www.sqlsecurity.com/DesktopDefault.aspx?tabid=37
although I don't think this is necessarily causing your problem.
Check out http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;309093
Check the event log for any hardware related problems, particularly disc
errors. Look at perfmon for high disc queue lengths.
Try running DBCC CHECKDB.
John
"Mats" wrote:

> After installing the 8.00.0818 patch i receive this error messages in the log
> trying to schedule the backups at night, it occurs after approx three minutes
> 1. Error 17883 The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung
> 2.Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 2,bp 0xe501c0, page
> 1:15), stat 0xb, object ID 2:1:2, EC 0x36F094E8 : 0, waittime 300. Not
> continuing to wait.
> 3.Waiting for type 0x2, current count 0x2a, current owning EC 0x3CD3D570.
> any suggestions
> --
> Best wishes

Error 17883 The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung:add information

After installing the 8.00.0818 patch i receive this error messages in the lo
g
trying to schedule the backups at night, it occurs after approx three minute
s
1. Error 17883 The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung
2.Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 2,bp 0xe501c0, page
1:15), stat 0xb, object ID 2:1:2, EC 0x36F094E8 : 0, waittime 300. Not
continuing to wait.
3.Waiting for type 0x2, current count 0x2a, current owning EC 0x3CD3D570.
any suggestions
--
Best wishesHi
There was an issue with 818 see
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...scid=kb;[LN];Q826161 try patch
to
819 or 878 http://www.sqlsecurity.com/DesktopDefault.aspx?tabid=37
although I don't think this is necessarily causing your problem.
Check out http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;en-us;309093
Check the event log for any hardware related problems, particularly disc
errors. Look at perfmon for high disc queue lengths.
Try running DBCC CHECKDB.
John
"Mats" wrote:

> After installing the 8.00.0818 patch i receive this error messages in the
log
> trying to schedule the backups at night, it occurs after approx three minu
tes
> 1. Error 17883 The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung
> 2.Time out occurred while waiting for buffer latch type 2,bp 0xe501c0, pag
e
> 1:15), stat 0xb, object ID 2:1:2, EC 0x36F094E8 : 0, waittime 300. Not
> continuing to wait.
> 3.Waiting for type 0x2, current count 0x2a, current owning EC 0x3CD3D570.
> any suggestions
> --
> Best wishes

Error -10535 SQL Server Connection Timed Out

We receive the following error in SQL 6.5 and I would like some help in getting it fixed.
Error -10535 SQL Server Connection Timed Out. We get this when a client dials in to run a query
All help is greatly appreciatedis this being done through a linked server?|||Originally posted by Memnoch1207
is this being done through a linked server?

No the application connects to the database through a SQL ODBC connection.|||What is the default net-library used to connect?|||Originally posted by Satya
What is the default net-library used to connect?

Sorry for the delay. It is TCP/IP

ERROR : FOR UPDATE cannot be specified on a READ ONLY ...

Hi All,
I am using SQL Server 2000 + JDeveloper 10g with ADF.
When i try to make changes to data and do COMMIT, I receive ERROR, I
have tried both JDBC Driver from Microsoft and jTDS, both FAILS.
Here is the error :
With Microsoft JDBC Driver :
(oracle.jbo.DMLException) JBO-26080: Error while selecting entity for
Departments
-- LEVEL 1: DETAIL 0 --
(java.sql.SQLException) [Microsoft][SQLServer 2000 Driver for
JDBC][SQLServer] FOR UPDATE cannot be specified on a READ ONLY cursor.
With jTDS JDBC Driver :
(oracle.jbo.DMLException) JBO-26080: Error while selecting entity for
Departments
-- LEVEL 1: DETAIL 0 --
(java.sql.SQLException) Line 1: FOR UPDATE clause allowed only for
DECLARE CURSOR.
Pls any body help...
Thank you,
Krist
Quite simple, really. SQL Server does not support FOR UPDATE; at least
not in the way that Oracle does. It's not standard SQL.
Alin,
The jTDS Project.
|||Hi ,
Thank you for your reply, it works now if I use JDBC driver from
Microsoft.
But if I use jTDS JDBC Driver, I get this error :
(oracle.jbo.DMLException) JBO-26041: Failed to post data to database
during "Update": SQL Statement
"UPDATE dbo.DEPARTMENTS SET DEPARTMENT_NAME=? WHERE DEPARTMENT_ID=?".
-- LEVEL 1: DETAIL 0 --
(java.sql.SQLException) Invalid parameter index 1.
Is there any options /setting on jDTS diver that I miss ?
Thank you for your help,
Krist
|||xtanto@.hotmail.com wrote:
> Hi ,
> Thank you for your reply, it works now if I use JDBC driver from
> Microsoft.
> But if I use jTDS JDBC Driver, I get this error :
> (oracle.jbo.DMLException) JBO-26041: Failed to post data to database
> during "Update": SQL Statement
> "UPDATE dbo.DEPARTMENTS SET DEPARTMENT_NAME=? WHERE DEPARTMENT_ID=?".
> -- LEVEL 1: DETAIL 0 --
> (java.sql.SQLException) Invalid parameter index 1.
> Is there any options /setting on jDTS diver that I miss ?
What does this have to do with FOR UPDATE?
Alin.
|||Hi Alin,
I am sorry, yes FOR UPDATE problem already solved after I upgrade to
JDev 10.1.2 and Oracle fix the problem by generating the correct sql
syntax for sqlserver.
However I still have problem with jTDS (described above).
I also post this in jTDS forum.
Thank you,
Krist
|||Could you enable DriverManager logging just before executing the code
that generates the exception and post the resulting log dump?
Alin.

Error - There is insufficient system memory to run this query.

Hello,

We receive this error after running a complex query. Could someone please shed some light on what this means exactly?

One of our developer said we needed to purchase a server with more memory, but would SQL Server not simply just run slower by using virtual memory instead of physical RAM?

I know there is a limit and servers must be upgraded as the processing requirements increase, due to data set size increases for example, but we have just been told to "purchase more power because after a while as you process more rows, SQL Server will require more resources"

Any comments on this would be really appreciated.the "complex query" may be written inefficiently. if you post the code, i am sure someone will help you. see Bretts sticky on the top of the page.|||The query is not important, meaning we wish to understand the specific cause of the error. Whilst executing the query, we observed that tempDB was only ~20% full and there was plently of virtual memory available. Does SQL Server require a certain amount of Physical RAM available even though there is an abundance of Virtual available.

Thanks.|||the "complex query" may be written inefficiently. if you post the code, i am sure someone will help you. see Bretts sticky on the top of the page.

Sean,
he will not post the code.Forget it.This is not the first time that he is not posting the code. http://www.dbforums.com/showthread.php?t=1211545|||I am perfectly happy if people choose not to reply, however I must point out that your previous comment was grossly inappropriate.

The code is in no way relevant to my question, which was further explained in my second reply. Whether or not the portion of code in question is complex or not is immaterial. I do not require assistant with optimizing this particular portion of SQL code, so please do not request I rewrite my question. I intentionally did not provide the code, as to take attention away from the real underlying issue.

I will also point out that as general courtesy both in an online and offline environment, should you not agree with another person's viewpoint or method of which they have gone about something, the mature response is to not get involved and leave it to those who may, should any chose to do so.

Thank You.|||I assume you have done a Google on the error message, and tried to exclude other causes of the message?|||It is not inappropriate or irrelevant. Bad sql can cause all kinds of trouble.